InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 3560
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2009

Re: retiredptt post# 255634

Monday, 01/13/2014 7:12:10 PM

Monday, January 13, 2014 7:12:10 PM

Post# of 312015
Your are absolutely correct - those problems didn't exist in 2011 when Mr. Bordynuik went on T.V. When both machines 1 and 2 were built they fully expected them to work as anticipated. After a time each were found to have problems. Their claims at the time were true but soon changed when clean-out resulted in too much down time. They projected roll-out with each model but those unexpected issues resulted in the need to evolve the processor to where we are now. Processor #3 is much different than the first two processors with the early problems seemingly resolved (continuous clean-out and 30+ continuous operating days).
If that remains consistent then they have they're flagship. And there appears to be a huge market because as soon as they reported the early results, buyers started lining up.


Whats important is that those problems didn't exist when Bordynuik made the 2011 claim on television that the processor at the time was the finished product and all he needed was $5 million to replicate its design.