I'm not arguing, just parsing out a redundancy in the post. #3, then, should instead be a subset of #2. No?
Btw- If I was asked to judge this overly exuberant (probably recruited), shareholder, however, I'd say:
1) You have no clue about the road ahead, aka "the big picture"; good, bad, or indifferent
2) You bring the reasonable/realistic longs down with your commentary -- it makes the board look juvenile, naive, and spurious. Have you considered the Yahoo board?
3) Aside from informative (yet probably nauseatingly repetitive) posts, everything else is silly.
Maybe you should check the rear view mirror and compensate accordingly. My advice:
1) Stick to reasonable expectations and nobody gets hurt (lol).
a) don't post exuberant jibberish
2) Take a step back, or away from the bid/ask.
a) choose smelling the coffee over kool-aid intoxication.
3) Don't assume the trustworthiness and transparency of the executives: Past, present, or future.
a) there is always some level of deception, it's innate in most businesses, particularly publicly traded ones.
Contrary to my acrimonious approach, I mean well, so heed my advice. I learned the hard way with a dog named Cortex Pharmaceuticals. Which brings me to my last piece of advice: Beware of standalone 'resident' board experts, as they may be the most misleading of all. It is the most knowledgeable contributors who can inflict the most damage on a board. Always question, never simply take their word for it. In other words, beware of the spin masters!
