InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 3178
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2012

Re: None

Thursday, 01/09/2014 5:40:30 PM

Thursday, January 09, 2014 5:40:30 PM

Post# of 20775
IN OUR CASE The motion to dismiss IS for all intents and purposes ruled against because the trial happens anyway Which to us is very good
The Motion to Dismiss is Decided and disposed of, (in our favor) it is gone, never to be seen again.
Here is disposed case, and in timeline the same, same motion, same order, has transcripts after order(Deals!) then- supreme trial P.C. and the two party's settle 5 days after.


Court: New York Civil Supreme
Index Number: 650528/2012
Case Name: MODERN CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC vs. STONECASTLE SECURITIES, LLC
Case Type: Cd-Econtract
Track: Complex

Appearance Information:
Appearance
Date Time On For Appearance
Outcome Justice /
Part Comments Motion
Seq
06/11/2013 Supreme Trial Other Settlement (Pre-Note) OING, JEFFREY K.
IAS PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE 48 10AM

06/04/2013 Supreme Initial (first time on) Prelim Conference Adjourned OING, JEFFREY K.
IAS PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE 48 10AM

03/05/2013 Motion Motion Decided-Open Appearance OING, JEFFREY K.
IAS MOTION 48EFM 10AM
002
10/19/2012 Motion Adjourned OING, JEFFREY K.
MUST SUBMIT WORKING COPIES 10AM
002
10/02/2012 Motion Adjourned OING, JEFFREY K.
EFSUBM
002
08/13/2012 Motion Motion Withdrawn OING, JEFFREY K.
EFILED COMMERCIAL SUBM CAL STIP
001
06/29/2012 Motion Adjourned OING, JEFFREY K.
EFILED COMMERCIAL SUBM CAL STIP
001

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.