DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

pattrn, That's a fairly weak premise to build a case on, if you ask me.

..why would such notable insitutions like Harvard & Moffitt be instruments of credidation to the bogus.

The only tangible connection between these institutions and ours is that money has changed hands (in only one direction) Esentially a sale has been made, with DNAG being the customer.

If credibility could be established simply by buying something from a creditable supplier, then no one would have creditibility issues.

It's not as if DNAG's money isn't any good. Harvard had something for sale....DNAG bought it. Did you think Harvard would refuse legal tender?

As far as they are concerned, if DNAG doesn't complete the terms of the agreement, they get to sell it again. How are they at risk?

In fact, according to the background regarding this item, DNAG is not the first buyer. Already at least one potential customer has failed to complete the deal. Were they reputable?

If you buy a computer from IBM to manage the books for an illegal drug cartel, does the transaction with IBM give you credibility? Does it reflect poorly on IBM?

regards,
frog