Let me get this straight. You're pointing the finger directly at me (although as you claim you don't do that) and suggesting I don't use comparable analysis...
You write this after wasting your afternoon writing a long diatribe telling me why Alterrus (a vegetable grower) can trade at nosebleed levels by comparing it to the IPO of a clothing company(yoga gear)... I can't wait for the first Alterrus analyst to hit the streets with his riveting comparative study on micro greens vs. stretchy pants.
You then follow it all up by promulgating - I'm right until someone proves me wrong with facts.
That, even though your entire diatribe was based on complete subjectivity and comparisons between companies in vastly different industries.
You talk extensively about Lululemon's IPO as a comparison. (I can't believe I'm actually going along with this). How about doing a comparison for us on Lulu's IPO financials to Alterrus's current financials. If you're using the same multiples then they must be similar right?
Hint:
LULU was a fantastic business. It had greater than 50% gross margins and a net margin of over 5%. You quote the share count as 150M for Alterrus and your math suggests that doesn't change over time although you've got them operating in every city in North America.
How does a company with negative equity, a lack of unencumbered assets to borrow against going forward, $36K in the bank, COGS that are currently 1.5X more than the Sales, with total 6 months sales representing .46 of other expenses not including COGS , and who is trying to mend borrowing relationship due to continued broken debt covenants ... expand without diluting?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.