Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:26:24 AM
Now the next question. In the blog Gerald mentioned the in-licensing transaction, which we now know the drug it's in reference to, and stated that "management believes [it] will attract institutional investors to the Company."
How so? Is the other party to the transaction so renowned/connected that it will lend instant credibility to AMBS? Is the drug so promising that it alone will attract institutional investors? Either way, an impressive comment by Gerald that may have been obscured by all the other impressive comments.
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM