InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/25/2013

Re: Det_Robert_Thorne post# 153724

Saturday, 12/28/2013 1:55:17 AM

Saturday, December 28, 2013 1:55:17 AM

Post# of 238846
"Nothing" Huh?
Just like the OJ case was ONLY about murder? Not race. Not celebrity. Not money.

And just like how companies only sue when they have been wronged, not to weasel out of a deal they feel unfavorable. No company would ever decide they don't like their existing partnership and therefore try to sue their partner on other grounds in order to dissolve any relationship.

The Dixie case reeks of a disgruntled company that may have entered into an agreement their officers feel is unfavorable. Of course Dixie doesn't mention complaints about licensing fees because the company does not want to come off as being greedy but wants to be portrayed as the victim in a breach of contract. Read between the lines and then you might find some real uncomfortable "truths."

Perhaps Dixie thought full scale recreational marijuana legalization was still 5 years away or doomed to get caught up in federal legality issues, and therefore entered into a partnership with MJNA that seems less favorable as Colorado is just days away from legally selling cannabis

"Emancipate youself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind"