Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[patientsdeservebest]

CP
I would not dismiss data out of hand just because it disagrees with your premise. The essence of science is to listen to the data, not to try and explain unfavorable data away.

It is not possible that two PPHM trials were tampered with. This defies the imagination. If people here really think that it would be a great story that I am sure the NY Times, or washington post, or LA Times would investigate and run with.

You can look at the PPHM PR they are replete with "promising" and lack any hard statistically significant data.

I admire your defense of King and company. You are certainly loyal. My question would be what would it take for you to start having second thoughts?

As for my agenda, it is simple I think the mgmt of PPHM is awful. If there is any utility in Bavi King and Co, will never find it.