![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, December 27, 2013 3:53:55 PM
Thanks for pointing that out, as if the 80 years of cannabis prohibition and propaganda wasn't enough to remind everyone.
But this federally illegal THC preventing profits argument is just ridiculous.
1. Every dispensary, medical or recreational, pay rent. Therefore landlords are indirectly profiting from THC sales, BUT the Feds already tried to pressure landlords and that failed.
2. Edible makers, many who produce products in their own homes, directly profit off THC by selling their goods to dispensaries but the Feds are not raiding them.
3. US Bank handles credit card transactions at many dispensaries in LA. How do you explain that? Are you even aware that one can buy THC with a credit card.
There are so many examples of individuals, companies and corporations directly and indirectly drawing revenue from federally illegal THC sales. I don't have the time to point out every one.
And how are you so certain MJNA will not benefit from Dixie if Dixie is a wholly owned subsidiary if Red Dice, a subsidiary majority owned by MJNA? The Dixie lawsuit may be directly tied to the THC revenue questions.
"Emancipate youself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind"
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM