InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.13
(
0.01%
)
Bitcoin
66,801.37
(
0.24%
)
Post# of 45771
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

d4diddy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

d4diddy

Re: ontheedge01 post# 7906

Thursday, 02/02/2006 1:18:59 PM

Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:18:59 PM

Post# of 45771
" believe the AG does have a letter(s) addressing, false info from Blair and Loch."

That must be another letter. That is NOT Poteet's Objection Letter to the SEC which we've discussed.

Poteet's letter allegedly objected to Loch management taking the test reports as submitted by Poteet and Cauthen and falsifying the data in PR's.

According to Ontheedge this letter was submitted to the SEC in 1999.

Another simple question, if Poteet submitted an Objection letter to the SEC in 1999, then why did he continue to support Loch Harris and attend trade shows and demos as Loch Harris continued to advertise a two meter stand-off distance. SPIE? The "DC" demo?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up