InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 121
Posts 4895
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/11/2006

Re: Myth post# 160141

Thursday, 12/26/2013 11:52:31 AM

Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:52:31 AM

Post# of 372089
I am not wrong, the word "review" does not change the meaning. The PR stated they would review and discuss "completed" audits at the SM. But if they are not completed, there will be nothing to review or discuss. The way it's worded, it will not be a lie if there is no completed two year audit to discuss.

Anyway, what's your point? That post was based on my opinion and the absolute fact this CEO has promised a completed audit now for about two years on many different occasions. He has failed to deliver that audit to date and has disappointed many shareholders. All one has to do is read this board to realize that fact. Because of the fact that this CEO has failed to deliver an audit in two years of promising, I highly doubt he will deliver in February. Again, I hope I am wrong but I have no faith in Eric Parkinson or Frederick Shefte. I am stuck here holding 750,000 shares with an average of .01498. I am hoping I can some day sell this garbage for a profit. Those predicting .05, .10 up to .25 cents a share are dreaming as far as I am concerned.

Happy holidays everyone. Drive sober and save some lives.