InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 2393
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/22/2012

Re: mkaiz post# 11411

Monday, 12/23/2013 12:11:15 PM

Monday, December 23, 2013 12:11:15 PM

Post# of 20775
Nope.Its a valid point and its good to have a real discussion.If ILNS had a FDA approved drug which they had the patents on with license agreements with big pharma the pps would be 5,10 bucks or higher and the float would be 1/3 of what it is.

Its very rare almost impossible for a tiny company like ILNS to ever be allowed to get to be a mid player like VPHM.

First they sold the licenses way back way to cheap.Who new top tier companies would spend billions to go forward and billions more will continue to be spent.

I say thats why the defendants wanted to seal the dollar amount,ect.That one and only transcript says alot.You paid to much or we did not pay enough and that will never happen again.Ha Ha

I think they got to greedy in 2011 and could have sold the company then.

If you don't think Pfizer other top tier companies don't have on payroll ones that investigate what they are ask one needs to rethink that.

Pfizer new Intellect's position.They new just when to strike at there weakest point.They new everything we new/know and 10 times more imho.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.