Re: Dr. Wade Poteet's alleged "Objection letter to the SEC"
Ontheedge has claimed that Dr. Wade Poteet filed an objection letter with the SEC. Ontheedge did not disclose the content of the letter, when the letter was allegedly delieverd to the SEC, nor how he became privy to this information.
It was implicitly understood (at least by me) from the conversation (on this board) that the letter objected to the falsification of test reports submitted to Loch Harris management by Poteet and Cauthen.
When I asked Ontheedge how I can find a record of this letter he replied that I should contact the State of Arizona Attorney General's office in Phoenix.
Not only have I contacted the Attorney General, I've also contacted the Phoenix and Tucson District Attorney's offices and I will report my findings to this board.
Why is this important? It's important because the content of the letter may provide concrete evidence that the management of Loch Harris intentionally falsified press releases concerning the perfomance of ELF. The date of the letter will help determine when Poteet finally got some free time away from the lab (Ontheedge's story) and realized that the investment public were being defrauded.
Will we ever find such an incriminating letter? I don't think so. My guess is that it's just another Ontheedge story similar to his "Absence of Malice" story.
Ask yourselves this question. If Ontheedge really believes that DaBoyz are the bad guys, and if he really believes that Poteet is innocent and that the alleged letter would exonerate him from any suspicion, then why does he not provide the information so shareholders can review the letter?
I believe it's just another tall tale, but will follow thru just the same.
