InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 4648
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2012

Re: buccaneer1961 post# 26033

Tuesday, 12/17/2013 8:35:30 AM

Tuesday, December 17, 2013 8:35:30 AM

Post# of 75609
My opinion hasn't changed since my first post here on 11/08/13. I have zero confidence in the Juno Beach site and know little about the Lantana site but believe that if anything worthy was there, for all the effort expended, something would be known by now. That said, I will also comment that under Florida State contracts, when recoveries are being made, a state inspector has to be on board (at least initially) and proper inventories maintained. That kind of tells me that noting to date has been recovered.

I do believe this Site #3 is valid. I say this not because of anything I have actually seen but base this on persons I know and trust who have supposedly seen some of the items recovered and had commented on very interesting touch marks on some of the recovered silver plates. The site is probably early 18th Century and could be one of the missing 1715 Fleet vessels. I do not agree with all the wild values being thrown around in these postings; billion dollars, etc. on a wreck site not even proven yet. Appears the whole SFRX ballgame play is riding on this site, whatever it is.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News