InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,399.22
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
18,531.60
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
39,935.07
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
81.01
(
-0.65%
)
Bitcoin
67,231.57
(
2.19%
)
Post# of 80490
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

grandma_of_jbraika

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 593
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/11/2010

grandma_of_jbraika

Re: sed_noli_modo post# 41239

Friday, 12/13/2013 12:18:35 PM

Friday, December 13, 2013 12:18:35 PM

Post# of 80490
Logically reasoning based on facts, you will be able to draw the same conclusion:

It was the FDA that did not follow the SAE-reporting standard criteria.


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94934530

Had the FDA followed the standard criteria, the agency would not have been able to come to its 24% SAE rate aiming at justifying its intentional Iclusig-withdrawal decision.

Your questions have been well answered, haven't they?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up