InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 336
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/29/2013

Re: None

Thursday, 12/12/2013 11:44:35 AM

Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:44:35 AM

Post# of 68424
Please don't attack me, I am just a layman in law. For instance, on March 1, 2014 (couple weeks after Jan 22, 2014 settlement conference, of course w/o settlement.), if... I say IF HJJ hammer on google (5% RR, google wants .5%, lol), google can take the ruling to CAFC from that day on, correct? Is it a another 10 months process? Can they take the case to SCOTUS after CAFC decision? As a code writing person, I do believe the W/A is red herring. Why? You need an engine to run a car (doesn't matter the car is front wheel drive or rear wheel drive.) Lang patent is the engine of the car (concept of click through rate.) The front wheel drive or rear wheel drive is the filtering process. Lang patent is a methodology (get the best results based on click through rate.) It doesn't matter how google changes the filtering steps, they still get the result from click through rate on ads.) Looking at the flow chart of a methodology. Programmers can code differently but the end result is the just the same.