InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2008

Re: 5bagger post# 13477

Wednesday, 12/11/2013 9:44:15 AM

Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:44:15 AM

Post# of 17759
I don't think that Fairholme is arguing there was a loss of share value or loss of dividends due to c-ship, so the "ripe" argument shouldn't apply. Even if it does, Epstein stated -from a legal point of view is my guess- that there is no need to wait for a damage to materialize to have a claim. Specially if the damage cannot be undone. I think Fairholme argues that the companies can't operate normally for restoration because of the sweep/net worth issue (3rd amendment). That is the takings. What was taken away was their ability to stand on their feet again.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FNMAS News