The different interpretation and calculation of rates of toxicity as reported by the manufacturer versus the FDA was concerning, given that everyone was looking at the same raw data. This is an example of the need for common parameters for calculating such risks, said Michael J. Mauro, MD, Leader of the Myeloproliferative Diseases Program at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center who was an investigator on both the drug’s Phase I and II trials. “One can render different opinions on their impact and their weight, but there shouldn’t be different ways of interpreting the risks or different ways of categorizing them. That’s a lesson this experience has taught us.” http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/blog/onlinefirst/pages/post.aspx?PostID=902They must've changed the SAE definition intentionally. The FDA officials and the Ariad employees are not idiots, are they? http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94742315