InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 593
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/11/2010

Re: biotech_researcher post# 40715

Saturday, 12/07/2013 10:07:39 AM

Saturday, December 07, 2013 10:07:39 AM

Post# of 80490
The French study is obviously biased as stated by the French investigators themselves:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94745692

Though biased, the French study is very good and the following conclusion should be very helpful:

These results should promote an extreme vigilance especially in older pts with known CV risk factors that will need to be strictly controlled and monitored. A preventive anti-thrombotic prophylaxis might be useful since Ponatinib initiation.

Despite the small cohort(only 19 patients), despite the obvious caveats and bias of such a study as stated by the French investigators themselves, despite the French study is obviously biased and therefore the justification of its conclusion is questionable, the paid pumper/basher at Oppenheimer biasedly uses the questionable conclusion in support of the FDA's intentionally exaggerated SAE rates.

Despite the Oppenheimer pumper/basher is biased, the shorts are posting his/her biased report everywhere.
**************************
I am going to join a class action lawsuit against.

I hope the law firm might help me get $0.001 per 1,000 shares that are qualified for the class action.

That is a bit low.

You might get ten times that.

smile

Class action security lawsuits are the REAL FRAUD.

zip - BTW - I am a lawyer.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.