InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 278
Posts 12043
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 02/09/2003

Re: PG post# 92676

Thursday, 12/05/2013 11:59:43 AM

Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:59:43 AM

Post# of 148335

Actually, dilution is only toxic when the increase serves no purpose other than to line the pockets of a corrupt CEO or is never invested in a manner that will allow for the generation of revenue. This is not the case with PVEC.

This is false. Dilution is considered "toxic" due to its magnitude regardless of the purpose for issuance of the new stock.

PVEC is a development stage company, dilution is oft times necessary to allow the company to move beyond development stage. That is a REALITY of a penny stock company. Anyone investing in a penny stock should understand that.

Peter Villiotis has massively diluted PVEC stock yet has achieved nothing in his over two years as CEO.

The actual FINRA numbers indeed show a SIGNIFICANT short position in PVEC as with many companies.

The FINRA semi-monthly data show no significant short position in PVEC stock. It has been explained multiple times that the FINRA daily data does not represent true short interest.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/PVEC/short-sales

This company's stock, as with MANY, has been heavily manipulated thereby further increasing the need for dilution.

The share price of PVEC stock has dropped dramatically due to dilution and declining shareholder sentiment. Peter Villiotis' history of false announcements and failed promises in addition to massive dilution is to blame for the decline in sentiment and share price, not some "manipulation" conspiracy by short sellers.