Look, you are not what I would call a proper moderator for this forum. Dahl stated there are 3 cases filed against Nova. When asked for the particulars on each case you quickly rose to his defense only to tell us you know all about the cases but have no intention of telling us what they are about, what the case numbers are, what courts they are in, or what the case titles are. That is except for the one case everyone knows about and that's the claim filed under the IBCL bankruptcy case.
What is that all about? Is this a forum for open honest discussion or is this a forum where only you and Dahl get to decide what people read? Why so defensive and why so hostile over a few simple questions? What possible purpose could it serve you to rise to Dahl's defense the minute anything is asked of him? If someone says this or that is fact others should be to ask them to provide proof and they shouldn't have to go through your gaunlet to do it.
Next we have the question of Dahl's background, you are the only one that seems to think it has nothing to do with this discussion. Everyone else on this planet understands that it does make a difference if a company is being sued by a hard working honest man with deep pockets or by someone deeply in debt with felony convictions.
AI
