InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 13591
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/07/2012

Re: None

Sunday, 12/01/2013 11:43:02 AM

Sunday, December 01, 2013 11:43:02 AM

Post# of 60260
...VIEW CAUSE FROM THE FDIC'S PERSPECTIVE..................

...yes, the FDIC inherited this MESS.............that being FIVE smoking guns and a strong case AGAINST the illegal seizure......

...so the FDIC, being the FDIC, moved (via the OCC) for the summary judgement, as did we, knowing that amy meant nothing...............amy would be APPEALED, regardless..........................

...so the FDIC sees the NOA, and HYPOTHETICAL HARVEY and decides not to fight a publicly-traded entity under the safety of the BK CT in Colorado...................................

...SO WE MAKE A DEAL.........................made a deal.......but the settlement is contingent upon BK CT approval and we have JPM trying to get stock, and promises and bitcoins................

...what was the deal, btw..............????????...........THAT'S THE QUESTION AND WE WILL KNOW THE STIPULATION PAYMENTS WHEN THE P-O-L IS APPROVED...........................THE END..............

...opinions hereon.................and pay no attention to that man behind the curtain offering GIRL SCOUTS 5.8 pennies for each share of UWBKQ.............................in blocks of 1,685 shares..................boatloads...........................the irony is a box of GS cookies = $3.50..................might also be the Claimant #8 STIPULATION p/s...........how weird.......??????..............imo.........................



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.