InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,958.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.15
(
-0.15%
)
Bitcoin
60,656.06
(
0.65%
)
Post# of 30046
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

lakeshore555

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 718
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2009

lakeshore555

Re: dcspka post# 18901

Saturday, 11/30/2013 4:11:33 PM

Saturday, November 30, 2013 4:11:33 PM

Post# of 30046
"non-enforceable?"

UNI just wants the equipment and know-how to manufacture DR-70. If they don't get that, they have been defrauded. Is that what you think Radient intends?

If they get the equipment and know-how, they can stop paying royalties to Radient, cancel the agreement, and manufacture/sell generic DR-70. It's not currently protected outside of the USA. So is that what you think UNI intends?

Do you think one or both parties is guilty of fraud?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up