InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 4648
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2012

Re: sctts post# 25613

Wednesday, 11/27/2013 3:22:01 PM

Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:22:01 PM

Post# of 75609
Don't agree. It is not to the State of Florida's financial interests since they don't commercially sell their received division of artifacts and treasure. At least they haven't in the past. Their interest is historical. In truth, I believe the state would be overjoyed if this Site #3 proved to be something else other than a 1715 Fleet wreck. If I'm wrong and there is evidence on public record proving otherwise(sale of treasure) I would like to know. This is a SFRX ballgame with allot to gain. As to the state, I believe they'd be joyous if this Site 3 proved to be something new other than another 1715 Fleet shipwreck as they have been accumulating artifacts and treasure from these particular wrecks for over forty years now. Be that what it may, the existing evidence apparently seen by some does point to a 1715'er.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News