InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 512
Posts 60076
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: SIIX post# 27256

Wednesday, 11/27/2013 7:32:56 AM

Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:32:56 AM

Post# of 59584
My only fear is that the company is trying to be too "by the book" and missing the chance to encourage the momentum of this reverse merger.

So MOMO is better than the legal "mumbo jumbo"?

Lot of things have to be dealt with, such as 1B shares held by former management, DTC, FINRA, S.E.C. filings, NV, etc.

If this was a P and D and MOMO was the only concern, we would have already seen revenue projections, or contracts PR'd, or some other type of typical fluff.

An importers license is virtually impossible to get back once it's gone. That's why the focus is cleaing up the "mess" created by others. Alonzo is seeking access to capital to grow the company. That capital needs to be "secured". This will be "by the book" even if it kills the MOMO.

Alonzo has been there, done that, and got a T-shirt, while others capitalized leaving him holding the bags and getting the blame by those that "claim" they study penny stock scams.