Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:35:05 PM
1. The injunction is not a material event. We can argue that it is, however the injunction itself does not have any money tied to it positive or negative.
2. If VRNG was trying to prop the PPS up, they would have PR's this event, they chose not to, why?
3. We all know that the only thing that will move this stock is actual income, I believe that VRNG wants to try to get ZTE to settle before HJJ makes his ruling. Why, because with a settlement and actual $$ in the coffers, VRNG has a much better position to negotiate with.
4. GOOG doesn't want to settle, we would all agree on that for the most part. However, if HJJ hits them with 7%RR, and the specter of latches being appealed, that might be the point in which GOOG decides the fight is over.
I believe this is coming to a head now, we will soon know and probably before the end of the year. Worst case, we fight the appeals and go after more infringers. This could be a cash cow for many years to come.
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. to Assume Direct, Non-Dealer Sales of Miranda Water Technologies in U.S. and Mexico in First Quarter of 2025 • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 8:31 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Launches High-Demand Mushroom Gummy Line for Targeted Wellness Needs, Tapping into a Booming $20 Billion Market • CBDL • Oct 31, 2024 8:00 AM
Nerds On Site Announces Q1 Growth and New Initiatives for the Remainder of 2024 • NOSUF • Oct 31, 2024 7:01 AM
Innovation Beverage Group Receives Largest Shipment of its Top-Selling Bitters to Date in the U.S.-Ready to Meet Growing Demand from Expanding Distribution Network • IBG • Oct 30, 2024 12:22 PM
Element79 Gold Corp to Update Investors on the Emerging Growth Conference on October 31, 2024 • ELMGF • Oct 30, 2024 9:08 AM