InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 250401

Saturday, 11/23/2013 11:00:21 AM

Saturday, November 23, 2013 11:00:21 AM

Post# of 312016
like i posted numerous times

PROs' backed THE OUTCOME of a less than stellar entity's
ability to wrest CONtroll of JBI (P2O) which clearly has both
*evolved* since 2009 and has *value*

that pattern was first noticeable by the remarkable *reality*
of having an *orchestrated* run on JBII >> TOTALLY BLOCKED
just b4 the July 2012 >> AGM

one can then observe the sideways PPS movement until the Fall of 2012
when the *reset/compress/reset* efforts ramped up

kick in the occasional *planned* raid .. (K filed/depo gate/CC)
and the potential to demoralize investors increases with every *round* undertaken

except of course for a handful of days in Jan 2013 ..
circumstantial evidence nails an entity *selling* JBII
at (approx) 77c .. BEFORE >> the sec settlement was *announced*

that *orchestration* got to 1.49 b4 *compression* being undertaken yet again

for 4 years the A co. was touted as the 2nd coming
it's being groomed for IPO status .. with very powerful *backers*

isn't it telling that every other co. out there isn't labeled a scam

after all none of these other co.s are yet public (US based) let alone
file with the dolts

and yet this can be measured .. where others can't ..

understand why UP has to be down and white has to be black ...

===============
from yesterday .. edited to *CONform* .. take note of the last line

duh is totally appropriate re: disruptive techs and which co. becomes the 800 pound gorilla in this newly emerging sector

for 4 years this board has had the A co. touted as the 2nd coming


re: selling shares .. since true comps can't be done because there
are no apple to apple comps .. one can read K*OR's filings from
their IPO debut .. and notice some rather *revealing* aspects
when comp'd to JBI/JBII (co./stock)

it is also beyond revealing that the ideal shareholder became the co.s CEO
4 years of observing both progress and underlying efforts to thwart
and yet RH just put 3M into JBI .. :)

access to capital is not a dirty word .. nor has it ever been an issue for JBI

folks only *lose* or gain $ >> when they sell .. beyond revealing
the *compression/reset/short cycle* has run unabated for well
over a year+ .. with one exception (a handful of days in Jan
2013 when the sec settlement was announced)

how revealing that a *whale* >> SOLD @ 77c (approx) mere days before
the sec settlement was *announced*

snicker

this corruption endemic in this stock has long since morphed beyond
the PROs' *usual cycle* of P&D of JBII >> that was so circa 2009


hooks are embedded deep .. truly comes as no surprise ..

risk rises the closer P2O moves to *proof of concept*

that too comes as no surprise to this actual shareholder


====

now here's a thought .. re: what mgmt can do when they are *ready*
to annihilate *some*

seat the BoD
file an 8k on 3's ops (audit)
file an 8k on the sale of a proc to X co. @ Y price tag


i've always recognized the risk and *realistic* time frames re: JBI
(check out that MAY 2012 IPO debacle to see how long it took
from incubation to IPO for that *disruptive tech* that has yet
to monetize)

JBII has a SS to be envied at this level .. they aren't measured
in the BILLION + like the aforementioned IPO

it's also beyond revealing that funding has never been an issue

lastly .. who can forget the actual time lost based on *KNOWN* bogus bs

that would be the dolt's crap done by rote (tells me this particular
level of cretinous filth has CONnections) >> shocker i know

the unKNOWN is circumstantial *rumours* >> of gross and egregious
incompetence .. deliberate .. or bought and paid for in advance
so the *outcome* to collect the IP for pennies on the $ would
spell success

i have called this latest *round* since the summer of 2012 ..
when i noted there were 3 outcomes in play for JBI (company)

one of which was for the co. to be taken private by >> er >> whales
who would have (if they could have) debuted P2O as an IPO to
compete with other co.s being groomed in this newly emerging sector

equally clear to me is that one set of PROs' backed the above outcome
and wound up on the wrong side of the *trade* which became even
more clear when RH took over as CEO

multiple levels in play *here* and very little is as it appears



====
4kids
all jmo

10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --