InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,815.03
(
0.61%
)
US TECH 100
19,700.00
(
-0.02%
)
Dow Jones
42,863.86
(
0.97%
)
Brent Oil
78.70
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,018.47
(
-0.27%
)
Post# of 60199
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

invest1980

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 12
Posts 426
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/28/2003

invest1980

Re: renoldman post# 27419

Friday, 11/22/2013 8:31:01 AM

Friday, November 22, 2013 8:31:01 AM

Post# of 60199
"I think what is really against UWBK is that they did act too slow to rectify the situation. "

Really? Think about that statement in the context of the environment at the time. The FDIC/OTC was seizing banks left and right at the time. Who in their right mind would invest in a bank without being absolutely sure their investment would not be seized /stolen? Raising $200 million in that environment is no easy task by any measure.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up