InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,997.85
(
0.41%
)
US TECH 100
20,535.60
(
-0.03%
)
Dow Jones
44,003.38
(
0.63%
)
Brent Oil
73.87
(
-2.11%
)
Bitcoin
76,323.12
(
0.56%
)
Post# of 159753
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

goodkarma37

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 4
Posts 551
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2005

goodkarma37

Re: None

Thursday, 01/26/2006 6:54:50 PM

Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:54:50 PM

Post# of 159753
As for the 10-QSBs for the period ended September 30, 2000 and 2001,
I have NO problem with that.

The Page 5 of the two 10-QSBs is different. ***** It seems that the company does NOT need to report detailed Financials from the third quarter of 2001 "as the company has become dormant." Anyway, those filings are done. So that is okay with me.

If we see "two" audited 10-Ks for 2000 and 2001 and "three" 10-Qs for the year 2005,
I think we will have no problem with the SEC filings.








Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up