O.T., I understand what you're saying. What I don't understand is that if they (the naked short seller) is illegally not borrowing the stock before they sell the stock short, why would they worry about covering at a certain price? Would they not be able to just hold and wait for the price to drop again? I was just curious about the posts that I read concerning the .01 cent target as the 'cover price' for the short sellers. Figured that if that were true, the price should have seen quite a leap after it passed a penny. Didn't seem to happen as advertised.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.