Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:08:16 PM
The laches ruling and the subsequent jury error are the major appeal issues, and IMO, JJ's reputation or legacy hinges on this case to a great extend because of his decision on laches. It is my opinion that JJ senses that his laches ruling is a reversable error, and an error that either directly or indirectly confused the jury, which in turned resulted in a error to the tune of several hundred of millions of dollar, plus another several hundred of millions of dollar on laches.
For the forgoing reason, JJ had showed a strong desire for a settlement because the settlement will somehow erase the laches and jury error issue, and consequently, history will not remember JJ as the Judge who erred on the laches, and either indiredtly or directly confused the jury (it is also my opinion that Vringo's legal team is also responsible for its mishandling of laches).
FEATURED Are we about to see a comeback? Steakholder Foods Charges Forward with New Commitments from Multiple International Players as it Transitions to Revenue Generation • Nov 18, 2024 11:56 AM
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Production of Gold Concentrate and Refinery Shipment at Bishop Gold Mill, California • Nov 18, 2024 9:00 AM
One World Products Sets New Standards in Sustainability With Strategic Hemp Innovations • OWPC • Nov 18, 2024 7:54 AM
Kona Gold Beverage, Inc. Updates Multi-Million Dollar Merger and Posts Over $1.2 Million in Q3 Revenues • KGKG • Nov 15, 2024 10:36 AM
HealthLynked Corp. Announces Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2024 Results with Strategic Restructuring, Third-Party Debt Repayment, and Core Technology Focus • HLYK • Nov 15, 2024 8:00 AM
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM