InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 191
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/02/2013

Re: Alan Brochstein post# 148202

Tuesday, 11/19/2013 12:30:34 AM

Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:30:34 AM

Post# of 238171
Sorry not trying to get in the way here. Just wanted to say your last article was good on MJNA and thanks for the openness. I hope you continue to write about the sector overall. It's a deep subject and history is being made.

As far as MJNA goes I'm pleased to see real sales happening. We all want them to straighten out and be more transparent. Still this is a penny stock and it's not an SEC reporting stock. So, it's not required to do many many things and we do ask a lot from them as shareholders. I don't blame them for not commenting and I'd rather see them focus on sales, marketing and industry position. It would seem weak of them to send a PR out explaining their list of decisions. Honestly the shareholders can't run the company and you can't give into their whims. This is a complex business situation and I bet it's a ruthless one.

Give us a million in sales next quarter. That's what I'd be concerned about at this point. Forward thinking wins here and not worrying about the past. The past is gone and so is 3Q.

The future is wide open and it doesn't hurt to dream. I wouldn't be so limited here in thinking. I feel MJNA does a good job of getting their name out to the public. They are hiring the right people for this and most importantly they have contacts with people that have power. Everyone is over looking the people with power aspect and that is a very non-business like perspective.

I respect that many people trade, but some invest in business. I get the traders view points, but a big win in vision comes from business and not trading.

I do agree MJNA is a high risk stock, but aren't they all even blue chips?

Figures don't lie, but people always figure.

Good luck guys!!