InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 44143
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2012

Re: jcwillis post# 93812

Monday, 11/18/2013 5:39:58 PM

Monday, November 18, 2013 5:39:58 PM

Post# of 97615
You ask: "Now why would that be?"

simple

because that is how the market reacts to criminal enterprises




Something to keep in mind is that full-scale implementation of B-PAC technology has been ongoing the last several years at numerous plants throughout the USA and verified to work, by third party labs. B-PAC is what is referenced by EPA with, "through currently available technology," to meet upcoming regulatory requirements for existing and new construction.

The testing of MBS (as an additive to PAC) with PAC being the main remediation ingredient, is claimed to have removed mercury emissions from an unknown cement plant. This, according only to the MBS vendor, has never been third-party verified to actually work as claimed.

PAC and B-PAC alone will easily meet the required percentage reduction, and is doing so right now. There is a place at the table for MBS as an additive to PAC, but the industry is using B-PAC right now. It is not a matter of time, as contracts are being awarded for B-PAC right now.

GTGP/J3/EMHI/SLUP are all interrelated for now.
Market understands and has spanked GTGP/EMHI/SLUP.

Now, why would that be
?