InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 718
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2009

Re: A deleted message

Monday, 11/18/2013 11:31:17 AM

Monday, November 18, 2013 11:31:17 AM

Post# of 30046
The SEC filings say DR-70 and CIT are failures.

DR-70: marketed since 1996, revenues have always been poor. There is no reason to think they will ever be anything else.

CIT: In their last 10-K, Radient declared CIT to have zero value and said it was not worth developing. They took a full write-off.

How would Radient "pare down" the existing debt? Interest has been accruing at 24% since Radient defaulted on the loans in early 2011. In addition, Radient disclosed in December 2011 that they were $900,000 behind in operational bills, and would have to cease operations, which they did in January 2012.

Radient did not have money to maintain FDA approval of onko-sure. They did not have enough money to pay insurance for the officers, who left. Even Boswell left. They haven't paid for a PR in how long?

Please provide your evidence that there are "interested parties." Thanks in advance.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.