InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,908.78
(
1.01%
)
Post# of 80490
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

frontiers

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 21
Posts 590
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2009

frontiers

Re: iandy post# 38870

Saturday, 11/16/2013 5:11:14 AM

Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:11:14 AM

Post# of 80490
So you admit that <<I am not qualified to make an objective analysis of Iclusig adverse events. >>

I can affirm that the oncologist investigators of the Iclusig follow up trials are QUALIFIED. Take a look at the papers they are presenting at ASH conf in December. The abstracts are posted.

Do you or jq1234 have any thoughts on why the conclusions drawn by the above oncologists are diametrically opposite to the negative conclusions of the FDA????

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up