InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2005

Re: moneyman2013 post# 4969

Thursday, 11/14/2013 6:09:18 PM

Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:09:18 PM

Post# of 8159
I'm with you moneyman2013. I have my table set and am prepared to eat crow. I'm challenging TomD. I've come to the conclusion that Dr. Tuttle probably made a suggestion to Tom at some solar industry convention in the past, and TomD proclaimed the moment as "advisory"; of course with Dr. Tuttle's permission. This act was probably deemed to give the company a little more clout. I have found no other mention of Dr. Tuttle's influence on the company; no delivery of stock options to him of any kind, unless I've overlooked something. I've just perused the 8-K's and 10-Q's following announcement of Dr. Tuttle to the advisory board. One thing that I did find (un-nerving) was that TomD's award of 5,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, in June, added to his 14,493,000 giving him an equivalence of 239,851,377 shares of common stock or approximately 63.85% of the Company's voting stock. There is a total of 16,000 stockholders with this company and he controls nearly 64% of the votes. In essence, this company should be private. And yet no shares have been shown to be awarded to Dr. Tuttle? What's in it for him? C'mon Tom, tear my foot off and shove it down my throat! Make an example out of me! I'm a shareholder who's willing to say that I was wrong. Tom doesn't satisfy the majority of the stockholders by answering pertinent questions because he alone is the majority. I apologize again, because I can only look at our presence here cynically and pardon the long rant.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent XSNX News