InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 20
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2013

Re: JJSeabrook post# 45059

Friday, 11/08/2013 1:50:33 AM

Friday, November 08, 2013 1:50:33 AM

Post# of 68424
Just a thought, if you think Vringo lawyers tried to go for a home run with the sanctions motion knowing that the chances were remote, then it would worry me. They tried it after the discovery of the workaround issue, where they had their experts review the changed system Google has in place. This would lead me into believing that Vringo legal team itself is either not sure if the changed system still infringes or they are convinced that it does not. Otherwise what was the need for these sanctions if they were convinced that the workaround still infringed.

We longs are of the opinion that the WA Google has in place still infringes and that is the reason, they did not document the changes. However, if they have produced the entire source code for review, then it would also mean that Google is confident about the WA.

PS: I am long and have been in it for more than a year.