The funding source could be a possible suitor who is at the table? Whatever/whoever it is, I don't think matters all that much, in terms of the buyout/big picture.. because the ratio of that 1Q debt to buyout prices assumed, kinda make that debt amt look to be an irrelevant, moot point.. I think this is now near halfway into 1Q anyway (?) and rather than implying a 2Q, I read it as offering to investors, the knowledge that they don't have to be concerned about any further dilution (or I could just as easily be light yrs off on this, as I barely understand any of it anyway). As to how much source committed, the Co says it's only what is needed to cover working capital for next few weeks (a small bone I guess). As to the suing for all infringements, I agree it would take much time & massive bucks, but who says it has to be only 1 law firm? I have been saying the concept of contingency is a plausible sounding answer, yet so far, I have seen no counter-argument to it (only a couple posters who agree), so if it is indeed a way, then I'm sure if there is 1 firm willing, then there are others available to join the force. But I still don't see how any of your orig post or this one, relates to voip, vp, or vp voip patents? Most of all (regardless of my not seeing the relation of the suit you posted, to vp & it's pafents), as I keep saying but not a word yet of acknowledgement.... if ANYBODY, albeit Google, MS (as if they need to be bigger & more powerful... why don't we just start cloning dictators?) or whoever, can be in control of all communications, by getting all of vp patents, THEN WHY DOESNT AND WHAT WOULD STOP VP FROM BECOMING THE BIGGEST VOIP COMPANY IN THE WOULD, BY DEFAULT, AND IN SHORT ORDER, BECAUSE IN A FEW DAYS, IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, VP WILL HAVE ALL 5 PATENTS ISSUED TO THEM, for the next 20 yrs (as long as they pay the maintenance fees), so all voip use, worldwide (?) would have to pay the piper (vp) unless THE PIPER (vp) sellsout. NOW... if some brainiac could even begin to crunch the numbers, as to what such licencing and infringement fees really equate to, in rightful $$, then I'm just guessing here, but that number has simply got to be be astronomical!! thus how can anybody tell me that such a fully legal potential (actually, not a potential, but a surety, no?) amount of world-changing money, could or would be "waved-off" / blown off, as money vp don't have for legal (which is what has been suggested here). And... I wonder if "available working capital" includes some deposit $ to get some lawyers started, on collecting some of these licence fees & infringement fees? After all, 3 of the patents have been in hand for awhile...
