Natcore Technology Inc (NTCXF)

[teq0904]

My example on Oct 30 at 6:31 erroneously used 35% when the nr is only 23% so we would be looking at $1.30 less 23% = $1 to produce something twice as powerful.
However the nr does not discuss the SE productivity % so maybe that was left out. Additionally, a bs cell is more efficient than a regular cell, and my example does not take that into account. Twice the power comes from the tandem + adding bs and se improvements may make it 2.30 the power of a normal cell. With the 23% cost savings that might get them up to double power at half cost.
That is enough theory with no solid numbers but I did it to try to reconcile the "half cost" claim so I will wait to see what else comes up if they are able to execute their other goals.