InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: rverboatgambler post# 8574

Thursday, 10/31/2013 7:39:27 PM

Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:39:27 PM

Post# of 131164
I believe what I said was "all but in the bag". That is based on the fact that it has been allowed for issuance by the patent ofc. I gave you the paste from the website that said exactly that, at least I thought I did? And I think someone else also told you that the CC occurred before the MG patent was allowed for issuance w/prosecution closed. So if I have any of that wrong I'm happy to be shown where but it looks that way to me..that all 5 patents are basically had... in that, 3 have been issued and the last 2, MG & I forget the name but "user interface... ...or interchange " or whatever it's called.... have both been approved for issuance. If that view is disputed by you or anyone, I can listen to why. If no dispute, in my mind, approved for issuance & prosecution is over, is plenty enough for me to consider them in the bag. I would also like to know (and I will search for...) if there are any significant number of utility patents that have been approved for issuance, at the same level as MG & the 5th one, and then been reminded by the gov.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News