InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 32901
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 06/08/2000

Re: midas98 post# 259594

Tuesday, 10/29/2013 11:15:41 PM

Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:15:41 PM

Post# of 447446
It would be unlawful and violation of the 1st Amendment if you were referring to the Republic.

Unfortunately Obama presides over the corporate government, it's "States", enclaves and territories (federal). That has NOTHING to do with the American Republic which currently exists in name only.

There are no God given Rights to the corporate façade. No inalienable Rights. No Bill of Rights. Only fraud and folly.

Only privileges granted by government. And what is granted by government is also taken away.

"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment."
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99


The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States,”
US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957.

The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”
Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226

"The persons declared to be citizens are, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject..."
Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94, 101, 102 (1884)

Sooner or later, probably later unfortunately,... someone will catch on.

Sad when a such a great and earnest People are fooled by those much cleverer than themselves.

If they would ONLY rely on principle rather than issue, they would catch on to these rat bastards.



"...once more, after the usual period of years, the torrents of heaven sweep down like a pestilence leaving only the rude and unlettered among you."

~Plato's Timaeus

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.