InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1838
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2004

Re: Andrew138 post# 53265

Saturday, 01/21/2006 2:22:22 PM

Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:22:22 PM

Post# of 326400
Andrew138, You are right - there have been nine (9) separate S-4 filings relating to the BSDS merger. If you review the top header of each filing, they are numbered by Neomedia as follows:

April 5, 2005 - original
June 6, 2005 - amendment #1
June 20, 2005 - amendment #1 (should have been #2)
July 15, 2005 - amendment #2 (should have been #3)
August 18, 2005 - amendment #3 (should have been #4)
September 13, 2005 - amendment #3 (should have been #5)
November 7, 2005 - amendment #4 (should have been #6)
December 28, 2005 - amendment #5 (should have been #7)
January 20, 2006 - amendment #6 (should have been #8)

I referred to it as number 6 because Neomedia did in their top header. Perhaps there is a good reason they numbered them the way they did or perhaps they didn't count correctly.

SS9173