Anyone here consider that distinct possibility? Will any of you believe that if it happens or will it become time to attack the peer reviewer's competence?
Listen, they wouldn't have peer reviews if they didn't contradict or raise questions about the reviewed study.
Concerns and questions are often raised on peer review. That is the job of the peer reviewer after all.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.