Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:19:16 PM
Me neither. I do not know what is wrong and what is right. I was just offering perspective. In the grand scheme of numbers I think that offering 50% will look silly and eventually will bite back. Some may take it, some may not. But the truth is that Fannie and Freddie are all about large, very large numbers. To the point that all Jrs. could be seen as inconsequential.
Sure the government can do anything they want. The government can also choose to continue to overreach and dilute the concept of "rule of law" to the detriment of the nation.
Trying to hurt shareholders for possible political benefits, this too is also silly. My humble view.
Recent FNMAS News
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 08:07:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 08:05:24 PM
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM