InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 797
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2013

Re: robbindabank post# 44434

Thursday, 10/24/2013 2:20:45 PM

Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:20:45 PM

Post# of 68424
In my view (not that you were asking me!) but firstly, its really anyone's guess since the info is sealed.

But, given our side (the good guys!) have provided additional evidence (likely as a salvo at Google's response) this can only be viewed as a positive.

Moreover, if we read the tea leaves as I like to do, and I have been called many names for that so take it with a grain of salt! lol, I think about how this case has unfolded, the types of responses, comments we've seen from google, then the types of responses, comments we've seen from VRNG.

Oh the whole when you think about the info, arguments etc, a logical person has continuously seen:

1. Google stall

2. Google throwing legal spaghetti at the wall hoping something would stick

3. Google often not even providing logical arguments that addressed (or fully) VRNG's arguments

4. Google "potentially" mislead (w/a, provision of information, laches etc)

So in that context, I would have to say, just a guess, that our lads have a pretty strong response and simply the fact they do, is positive.

I really do believe google may have walked into a trap and is stuck.

Lets hope my tea leaves are right!