That also caught my attention. However, the difference might be due to the fact that the control arm in PREVAIL was placebo. It was prednisone in the Zytiga trial.
A supporting fact for the above argument is that rPFS of the control arms were 8.28m vs 3.9m in in the Zytiga trial vs this trial. I cannot think of any other reason why the median rPFS should differ this much in these trials.
Another (weaker) supporting argument is that I can guesstimate that the median rPFS of Zytiga from the KM graph to be about 16.5m. This should be about in the same ballpark for Enzalutamide (based on the lower CI, which was 13.8m).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.