InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,727.17
(
0.48%
)
US TECH 100
19,393.60
(
0.67%
)
Dow Jones
42,179.99
(
0.40%
)
Brent Oil
77.93
(
0.15%
)
Bitcoin
62,165.00
(
2.33%
)
Post# of 495952
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

seabass

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 5029
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2002

seabass

Re: hap0206 post# 15133

Friday, 04/18/2003 1:46:50 PM

Friday, April 18, 2003 1:46:50 PM

Post# of 495952
>>>its a war against all nation who aid and abet terrorism -- it was the risk that Iraq would furnish a terrorist with, say 'anthrax' that made immediate disarmament necessary<<<

Pakistan and North Korea could easily furnish terrorists with nuclear weapons according to the Bush administration. Why isn't immediate disarmament of those nations necessary? And if disarmament of Iraq was the reason for the operation, why was it named "Iraq freedom" instead of "Iraq disarmament"? Because disingenuous propaganda is what makes this White House tick?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up