Ali was forced to reveal Rainco's role, wilma.
The pressure came on three fronts:
1. Your discovery of the Metwood filing.
2. Linc's discovery that DeLong had incorporated GEG in Georgia.
3. The fact that, despite Ali issuing misleading PRs, DeLong has ensured that UBRG always files accurate statements in the 10-Q
The GEG (UK) Ruse
I don't think it was ever intended to develop a ruse that GEG was the company in Inverness. The clues given about GEG (being a London-based holding/investment company) didn't point to the GEG of Inverness, Scotland.
The fiction of the Scottish company only developed because you put it to Shawn, and he went along with it.
The original intention was merely to leave the company's identity obscured. And leave shareholders guessing.
Why would Metwod buy GEG (UK)
There never was a valid reason why Metwood would buy GEG (UK) for its fabrication business. Similarly, there was no commercial reason why GEG would buy Metwood for its patents.
Why would Metwood buy UBRG
There is no commercial reason for Metwood acquiring UBRG. Neither company benefits from the deal. Metwood doesn't have the money that UBRG needs to finance operations. And UBRG doesn't have the profits that Metwood needs to uplist.
When you have a hammer everything resembles a nail
Ali and DeLong are repeating what they've done before.
When they did this scheme previously they had REVO become the 'parent' of Greenwood. That was a financial holding company that they spun off from Rainco. There's no reason why a patent and technology company would buy a financial company.
They repeated this with Metwood becoming the 'parent' of GEG (a financial holding company). UBRG was acquired as collateral baggage held by GEG. There's no reason why a residential construction company would buy an energy marketing company.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
