Saturday, October 19, 2013 3:38:42 PM
The pricing I have discussed previously. It's a matter of supply/demand.
Your Q on Mil-Ler having an option over 20m shares at 5 cents is a strategic positioning for Tonogold. We would like to be able to consolidate 100% of the project in the future into a public vehicle. By Mil-Ler having a reasonable position in Tono as a result of their potential 20m shareholding places is in a good strategic position to be the public consolidated vehicle. Also any benefit that would result in an increase in the Tono share price will be the benefit to the company that we will have a 34% stake in and will therefore share in any rerating. This part of the deal was well thought through.
I can't answer your last question as it doesn't make sense. The 1st option costs $5m and we get 17%. That the pricing. It's irrelevant what price it's done at - we end up with 17%. That's the key.
Hope this provides some clarity and now I have to focus other matters.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM