Saturday, October 19, 2013 3:38:42 PM
The pricing I have discussed previously. It's a matter of supply/demand.
Your Q on Mil-Ler having an option over 20m shares at 5 cents is a strategic positioning for Tonogold. We would like to be able to consolidate 100% of the project in the future into a public vehicle. By Mil-Ler having a reasonable position in Tono as a result of their potential 20m shareholding places is in a good strategic position to be the public consolidated vehicle. Also any benefit that would result in an increase in the Tono share price will be the benefit to the company that we will have a 34% stake in and will therefore share in any rerating. This part of the deal was well thought through.
I can't answer your last question as it doesn't make sense. The 1st option costs $5m and we get 17%. That the pricing. It's irrelevant what price it's done at - we end up with 17%. That's the key.
Hope this provides some clarity and now I have to focus other matters.
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM