InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 313
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/10/2013

Re: loanranger post# 44024

Friday, 10/18/2013 10:59:24 PM

Friday, October 18, 2013 10:59:24 PM

Post# of 403224
I think we have to agree to disagree on this.

"The registration requirement is typical of these types of deals. Whether Aspire intended to do any selling or not, they wanted to know that they COULD if the mood struck them. That's "why the registration statement".

I have never seen a registration statement filed just so they "COULD if the mood struck them". They are generally executed with developmental stage bios.

"The fact is that there are plenty of other shareholders who could have provided the selling pressure.....we don't have to invent them. ".

Where's the filing then?

If you would like me to concede that there isn't absolute proof, fair enough. Isn't it pretty obvious though. If I'm confronted by something that looks like a duck and it goes quack, I don't need a DNA test.

Proof doesn't make you money in the market, reasoning does. Proof is always late and it doesn't really exist anyways.

I don't care if Aspire is selling or not. My only goal was to put to bed the conspiracy theories. We aren't being manipulated. The market makers aren't keeping this down. It's not shorts. It's selling, plain and simple.

If anyone wants to know where it's coming from look at the filings. It's simple.

We all all here because we believe the risk is worth the reward but make no mistake, the risk is high. Aspire isn't holding but if it makes you feel better to believe they are, then go ahead. Either way I think we see new highs soon.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News